United States v. Jose Amador-Galvan, AKA Jose Amador Pullido-Villareal, United States of America v. Rodolfo Molina, Jr.

Good Law
12 F.3d 1108·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 36543
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 22, 199393-10595California2,364 words

Opinion

Opinion

12 F.3d 1108 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jose AMADOR-GALVAN, aka Jose Amador Pullido-Villareal, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Rodolfo MOLINA, Jr., Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 92-10325, 93-10595 and 92-10715. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Oct. 7, 1993. Decided Nov. 22, 1993. Before: FERGUSON, THOMPSON, and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Jose Amador-Galvan and Rodolfo Molina were convicted of conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute over five kilograms of cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. Sec. 846 , and possession with intent to distribute 5 kilograms or more of cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. Secs. 841 (a)(1) and 841(b)(1)(A)(ii)(II). 3 Amador-Galvan seeks review of the district court's refusal to sever his trial from that of codefendant Molina's. Molina seeks review of the district court's admission of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.