In re Sun

Good Law
12 F.3d 1108·1993 WL 523610·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 36561
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 16, 199392-16442California881 words

Opinion

Opinion

12 F.3d 1108 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. In re WAI HA SUN, fka Christianna Wai Ha Sun, Debtor. WAI HA SUN, fka Christianna Wai Ha Sun, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Theodore J. TICKTIN, Aki Mizushima, Central Realty Ltd., Ichizo Nisho, Jerome L. Silpa, and Gerald T. Manpearl, Bishop Trust Co., Ltd, and Robert H. Tanaguchi, Security Title Corporation, Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-16442. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 13, 1993. * Decided Dec. 16, 1993. Before: POOLE, BEEZER, and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Sun worked in a bar owned by Ticktin and Henig. Ticktin died. Henig and Sun (who lived with Henig) claimed interests in the bar. Ticktin's estate sold the bar to Nishio. Since then, Nishio and Ticktin's estate have been in litigation with Sun and Henig. Sun filed adversary proceedings to get ownership of the bar. Nishio filed counterclaims for rent and damages for her interference with their ownership. 3 Sun…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.