United States v. Jose Armenta

12 F.3d 1108 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jose ARMENTA, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-50593. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Nov. 3, 1993. Decided Nov. 30, 1993. 1 Before: BROWNING, BEEZER, and TROTT, Circuit Judges 2 MEMORANDUM * I. 3 Motion to suppress evidence. 4 Because we held in United States v. Terry, No. 92-50262, slip op. 12999 (9th Cir. Nov. 18, 1993), that publication of General Order 384 in a local legal newspaper and posting a copy of the order on the courthouse bulletin board was insufficient notice, posting a copy of General Order 384-A on the courthouse bulletin board was insufficient notice. We reverse and remand for an evidentiary hearing on the motion to suppress. If the motion is granted, Armenta shall be allowed to withdraw his guilty plea. II. 5 Sentencing. 6 The district court's factual findings in the sentencing phase are reviewed for clear error.…