Dianna Seeklander v. A.B. Dick Company, a Delaware Corporation

12 F.3d 1108 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Dianna SEEKLANDER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. A.B. DICK COMPANY, a Delaware corporation, Defendant-Appellee. No. 92-35225. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Nov. 1, 1993. Decided Nov. 18, 1993. Before: TANG, FARRIS, and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 The district court granted partial summary judgment to A.B. Dick, Co. on Dianna Seeklander's breach of employment contract claim. A jury returned a verdict for A.B. Dick on Seeklander's employment discrimination claim. Seeklander appeals, claiming the district court made numerous errors before and during the trial. We affirm. 3 I. The decision not to exclude witnesses that A.B. Dick had identified after the close of discovery. 4 We review the district court's decision not to impose discovery sanctions for an abuse of discretion. Adriana Int'l Corp. v. Thoeren, 913 F.2d 1406 , 1408 (9th Cir.1990), cert. denied, Lewis & Co.…