United States v. Nancy Brown
Opinion
Opinion
12 F.3d 1108 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff--Appellee, v. Nancy BROWN, Defendant--Appellant. No. 93-50037. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Nov. 5, 1993. Decided Dec. 8, 1993. Before: FLETCHER, PREGERSON, and NORRIS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Defendant Nancy Brown appeals her jury convictions for conspiracy to commit theft, 18 U.S.C. Sec. 371 , and theft of money from a program receiving federal funds, 18 U.S.C. Sec. 666 . She contends that her convictions should be reversed for the following reasons: (1) the government presented perjured testimony; (2) the district court improperly instructed the jury on the elements of theft under Sec. 666; and (3) the court failed to instruct the jury not to use evidence of the convictions of Brown's accomplices when assessing her guilt. We affirm the convictions. 3 * Brown argues that her conviction should be reversed because perjured…