Richard John Sherriff v. Manfred Maass, Superintendent, Oregon State Penitentiary

Good Law
12 F.3d 1108·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 36542
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 17, 199393-35027California2,573 words

Opinion

Opinion

12 F.3d 1108 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Richard John SHERRIFF, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Manfred MAASS, Superintendent, Oregon State Penitentiary, Respondent-Appellee Nos. 92-36755, 93-35027. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Nov. 1, 1993. Decided Nov. 17, 1993. Before: REINHARDT, BRUNETTI, AND FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Richard John Sherriff, an Oregon state prisoner, appeals the district court's partial denial of his petition for habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 , as well as the district court's denial of his motion for further relief. Sherriff alleges that the Oregon State Board of Parole failed to comply with the district court's order to recompute any potential reduction in his release date based on the law in effect at the time of his offense. He also alleges that the Board failed to follow its own rules in recomputing this reduction. Because the Board complied with both the District…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.