United States v. Preston Hall, Jr.

12 F.3d 1109 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Preston HALL, Jr., Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-50493. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 17, 1993. * Decided Dec. 6, 1993. Before: SCHROEDER, D.W. NELSON, and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Preston Hall, Jr., appeals his conviction, following a jury trial for transportation of stolen traveler's checks in interstate commerce in violation of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 2314 . Hall contends that insufficient evidence supported his conviction for transportation of stolen traveler's checks. He also contends that the evidence produced at trial fatally varied from the allegations contained in the indictment. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and we affirm. I. Sufficiency of the Evidence 3 We review the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution to determine whether any rational trier of fact could find the essential…