United States v. Dep Huynh George

12 F.3d 1109 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Dep Huynh GEORGE, Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-10160. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 17, 1993. * Decided Dec. 1, 1993. Before: SCHROEDER, D.W. NELSON, and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Dep Hyunh George appeals pro se the imposition of a $10,000 fine as part of her sentence, following a jury trial, for conspiracy to violate the Trading With the Enemy Act in violation of 18 U.S.C. Secs. 2 , 371, 50 U.S.C.App. Secs. 5, 16(b) and 31 C.F.R. Sec. 500.201(b)(1). Despite a negotiated sentencing agreement which expressly waived her right to appeal, George contends the district court erred by failing (1) to expressly state its reasons for imposition of the fine and (2) to consider her ability to pay. Alternatively, George contends she did not voluntarily and knowingly waive her right to appeal the fine. We have jurisdiction under…