United States v. Manuel Chaidez-Castelo

12 F.3d 1109 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Manuel CHAIDEZ-CASTELO, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-10068. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 13, 1993. * Decided Dec. 15, 1993. Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, GARTH ** and WIGGINS, Circuit Judges. MEMORANDUM 1 Chaidez-Castelo appeals from the judgment of conviction for conspiracy to possess cocaine with intent to distribute in violation of 21 U.S.C. Secs. 846 and 841(a)(1), and possession of cocaine with intent to distribute in violation of 21 U.S.C. Sec. 841 (a)(1). The district court had jurisdiction over this case pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 3231 . We have jurisdiction over this timely appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We affirm. 2 Chaidez-Castelo challenges the admissibility of evidence obtained from a wiretap. The district court denied Chaidez-Castelo's motion to suppress. We review rulings on motions to suppress de novo.…