United States v. David Lee Grissom

12 F.3d 1109 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. David Lee GRISSOM, Defendant-Appellee. No. 92-30416. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Nov. 1, 1993. Decided Nov. 18, 1993. Before: WRIGHT, GOODWIN and HUG, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 David Lee Grissom appeals his convictions and sentence for bank fraud, mail fraud and making false statements to federally insured financial institutions. We affirm the convictions, vacate his sentence and remand for resentencing and additional factual findings. 1. Refusal to Instruct on Good Faith 3 We have held repeatedly that a "defendant is not entitled to a separate good faith instruction when the court adequately instructs on specific intent." E.g., United States v. Lorenzo, 995 F.2d 1448, 1455 (9th Cir.1993) (internal quotations omitted), cert. denied, 62 U.S.L.W. 3250 (U.S.1993); United States v. Rushton, 963 F.2d 272, 274 (9th…