United States v. David Thomas MacMillan A/K/A David Thomas Barrett

12 F.3d 1109 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. David Thomas MacMILLAN, a/k/a David Thomas Barrett, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-30497. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Nov. 3, 1993. Decided Dec. 3, 1993. Before: WRIGHT, GOODWIN, and HUG, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Appellant David MacMillan challenges his bank robbery conviction and subsequent 210-month sentence. Specifically, MacMillan challenges the district court's admission of incriminating statements made to police in violation of his rights established in Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966). MacMillan further challenges the district court's determination that he was a "career offender" for sentencing purposes. I. Denial of Motion to Suppress 3 We review a district court's denial of a motion to suppress evidence de novo. United States v. Thomas, 863 F.2d 622, 625 (9th Cir.1988). This court will accept a district…