United States v. Theodore Joseph Maestas

12 F.3d 1109 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Theodore Joseph MAESTAS, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-50580. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 2, 1993. * Decided Nov. 18, 1993. Before: WRIGHT, GOODWIN and HUG, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Theodore Joseph Maestas appeals his sentence following a guilty plea to one count of bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 2113 (a). We affirm. A. Anders Brief 3 Maestas' court-appointed counsel filed an Anders brief informing us that she found no non-frivolous arguments upon which to base an appeal and requesting that she be relieved as counsel. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Before acting on her motion to withdraw, we must examine the record to determine whether her evaluation of it was sound. See Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 82-83 (1988). We agree with her conclusion that no issues merit appeal. She raises two issues in…