United States v. William Boyd Fillingame, Jr., AKA Lonnie Allen Hutchens, Randy Hutchens, Lyle Little, Edward Joseph Foley, Randy W. Sammones

12 F.3d 1109 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. William Boyd FILLINGAME, Jr., aka Lonnie Allen Hutchens, Randy Hutchens, Lyle Little, Edward Joseph Foley, Randy W. Sammones, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-30477. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Nov. 4, 1993. Decided Nov. 16, 1993. Before: REINHARDT, BRUNETTI, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 William Boyd Fillingame appeals his 210-month sentence, which was imposed after he pled guilty to conspiracy to manufacture methamphetamine with intent to distribute in violation of 21 U.S.C. Secs. 841 (a)(1), (b)(1)(C), and 846. Fillingame contends that the district court erroneously calculated the amount of methamphetamine producible by the drug laboratory he was operating. We affirm. 3 Essentially, Fillingame's claim is that the evidence before the district court did not support its determination regarding the scale of his…