United States v. Melanie Crowell

12 F.3d 1109 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Melanie CROWELL, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-10524. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Aug. 30, 1993. Decided Nov. 30, 1993. 1 Before: D.W. NELSON and NORRIS, Circuit Judges, and BELLONI, Senior District Judge * 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 Appellant Melanie Crowell appeals the district court's denial of her pretrial motions. After the district court denied Crowell's motion to suppress the fruits of a search warrant and motion to suppress statements, Crowell entered a conditional guilty plea to one count of possession with intent to distribute a quantity of crystal methamphetamine in violation of 21 U.S.C. Sec. 841 (a)(1). Crowell contends that the district court improperly relied on information secured through a wiretap order; that the search warrant was not supported by probable cause; that the search of her purse exceeded the scope of the…