Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 Provides That Dispositions Other Than Opinions or Orders Designated for Publication Are Not Precedential and Should Not Be Cited Except When Relevant Under the Doctrines of Law of the Case, Res Judicata, or Collateral Estoppel. United States of America v. Renee Lynn White, AKA Renee Lynn Vickery, United States of America v. Robert Vickery, United States of America v. Mark Douglas Pirtle

12 F.3d 1110 Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Renee Lynn WHITE, aka Renee Lynn Vickery, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert VICKERY, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mark Douglas PIRTLE, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 92-30290 to 92-30292. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Aug. 30, 1993. Decided Dec. 9, 1993. Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, BOOCHEVER and NOONAN, Circuit Judges. MEMORANDUM 1 White, Vickery, and Pirtle appeal from their convictions and sentences for conspiracy to manufacture methamphetamine and related offenses. White and Vickery were convicted of one count of conspiracy to manufacture methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. Secs. 846 & 841(a)(1); one count of possession of methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. Sec. 841 (a)(1); and one count of possession of marijuana with intent to…