United States v. John Wesley Williams

Good Law
12 F.3d 1110·1993 WL 497988·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 36409
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 1, 199393-10199California228 words

Opinion

Opinion

12 F.3d 1110 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John Wesley WILLIAMS, Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-10199. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 17, 1993. * Decided Dec. 1, 1993. Before: SCHROEDER, D.W. NELSON, and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 John Wesley Williams appeals his conviction and 115-month sentence following entry of a guilty plea to interference with commerce by threats or violence in violation of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1951 . Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Williams' counsel filed both a brief stating that she finds no arguable issues for review and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83 (1988), discloses no issue for review. Accordingly, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED and the district court's judgment is AFFIRMED. * The panel unanimously finds this case…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.