United States v. Douglas Lee Webster

Good Law
12 F.3d 1110·1993 WL 497946·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 36416
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 1, 199392-10230California1,462 words

Opinion

Opinion

12 F.3d 1110 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Douglas Lee WEBSTER, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-10230. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 17, 1993. * Decided Dec. 1, 1993. Before: SCHROEDER, D.W. NELSON and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Douglas Lee Webster appeals his conviction and 360-month sentence imposed following a jury trial for possession with intent to distribute methamphetamine in violation of 21 U.S.C. Sec. 841 (a)(1). Webster contends: (1) the district court erred by denying his motion to suppress an allegedly involuntary post-Miranda statement and refusing to grant an evidentiary hearing on the motion; (2) he received ineffective assistance of counsel during the sentencing proceedings; and (3) the district court erred by refusing to depart downward from the applicable Guidelines range. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and we affirm. 3 *…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.