United States v. Daniel Oswaldo Renteria

12 F.3d 1110 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Daniel Oswaldo RENTERIA, Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-50114. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 17, 1993. * Decided Dec. 1, 1993. Before: SCHROEDER, D.W. NELSON and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Daniel Oswaldo Renteria appeals his conviction following a conditional guilty plea to illegal rentry after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. Sec. 1326 (b)(2). Renteria contends the district court erred by denying his motion to suppress evidence because he was improperly detained for questioning by Immigration and Naturalization Service ("INS") Special Agents, his warrantless arrest was not supported by probable cause, and his subsequent confession was the fruit of his illegal arrest. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We remand for further proceedings on the motion to suppress evidence. 3 We review de novo the…