United States v. Ruben Vidaurreta, A/K/A Ruben Turner

12 F.3d 1110 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ruben VIDAURRETA, a/k/a Ruben Turner, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-50738. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 17, 1993. * Decided Nov. 30, 1993. Before: SCHROEDER, D.W. NELSON and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Ruben Vidaurreta appeals his 24-month sentence imposed after a guilty plea to bank fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1344 (a). Vidaurreta contends the district court erred by (1) enhancing his offense level under U.S.S.G. Sec. 2F1.1(b)(2) for a scheme to defraud more than one victim, and (2) denying him a downward adjustment for his role as a minor or minimal participant in the offense under U.S.S.G. Sec. 3B1.2. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and we affirm. 3 Vidaurreta contends the district court erred when it enhanced his offense level under section 2F1.1(b)(2) after finding that the bank fraud…