United States v. Russ Attridge Systad

12 F.3d 1110 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Russ Attridge SYSTAD, Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-30124. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 6, 1993. * Decided Dec. 16, 1993. Before: SNEED, NOONAN, and TROTT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Russ Attridge Systad appeals his conviction following entry of a conditional guilty plea for manufacturing marijuana in violation of 21 U.S.C. Sec. 841 (a)(1). Systad contends that (1) the district court erred by not granting his motion for a Franks hearing; (2) the search warrant was not supported by probable cause; and (3) the search was not justified under the good faith exception. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 and we affirm. 3 The search warrant issued on an affidavit containing the following information: Cal Walker had been a Deputy Sheriff for thirteen months. Prior to that, Walker spent three years as a patrol investigator…