Duane Dennis Wynn v. William Bunnel, Warden John K. Van De Kamp

Good Law
12 F.3d 1111·1993 WL 524133·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 36435
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 15, 199393-15588California1,119 words

Opinion

Opinion

12 F.3d 1111 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Duane Dennis WYNN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. William BUNNEL, warden; John K. Van De Kamp, Respondents-Appellees. No. 93-15588. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Sept. 27, 1993. * Decided Dec. 15, 1993. Before: CHOY, GOODWIN, and SKOPIL, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Duane Dennis Wynn was charged with two counts of forcible oral copulation, two counts of forcible oral copulation in concert, and one count of forcible sodomy in concert, in violation of Cal.Penal Code Secs. 288a(c), 288a(d) and 286(d). After a jury trial, Wynn was found guilty on all five counts. On May 20, 1982, Wynn was sentenced to 28 years, based on concurrent sentences of seven and nine years, and consecutive sentences of six, six and seven years, pursuant to Cal.Penal Code Secs. 667.6(c) and 667.6(d). 3 Wynn now appeals pro se the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 habeas petition. Wynn claims that the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.