Fred A. Whitaker v. Alameda County Superior Court

12 F.3d 1111 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Fred A. WHITAKER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ALAMEDA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, Defendant-Appellee. No. 92-17001. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 17, 1993. * Decided Dec. 1, 1993. Before: SCHROEDER, D.W. NELSON, and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Fred A. Whitaker appeals pro se the district court's denial of his motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction against the California Court of Appeals. Whitaker also appeals the district court's denial of his motion to disqualify the district court judge. We affirm. 3 * Preliminary Injunction 4 Whitaker contends the district court erred by denying his motion for a preliminary injunction. This contention lacks merit. 5 We have jurisdiction to review the denial of a preliminary injunction. See 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1292 (a)(1). 1 We will reverse a district court's denial of a preliminary injunction only if the district…