Emmitt D. Walls v. Industrial Commission of Arizona, U.S. Commercial Cabinet and Fixtures, Inc and Special Fund Division, No Insurance Section

12 F.3d 1111 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Emmitt D. WALLS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF ARIZONA, U.S. Commercial Cabinet and Fixtures, Inc; and Special Fund Division, No Insurance Section, et al., Respondent-Appellee. No. 93-15850. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 6, 1993. * Decided Dec. 15, 1993. Before: SNEED, NOONAN, and TROTT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Emmitt D. Walls, an Arizona state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's denial of his motion for leave to file a late appeal. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We review for an abuse of discretion the district court's denial of a motion for an extension of time to file a notice of appeal. Alaska Limestone Corp. v. Hodel, 799 F.2d 1409, 1411 (9th Cir.1986). We affirm. 3 Walls contends that the district court caused him to file a late notice of appeal by advising him to file a direct appeal with the United States Supreme…