Reyes v. Atlantic Richfield Company

Good Law
12 F.3d 1464·93 Daily Journal DAR 15498·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 31643·93 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9011
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 8, 199391-56106California4,870 words

Opinion

Opinion

12 F.3d 1464 Wilfredo REYES and Bernardita Reyes, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. ATLANTIC RICHFIELD COMPANY, ARCO Petroleum Products Co., Terry Firestone, Edward Loza, T.R. Murphy, Nancy Dicks, Cynthia Weston, and Does 1 through 200, inclusive, Defendants-Appellees. No. 91-56106. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Oct. 6, 1992. Decided Dec. 8, 1993. 1 Cheryl Shensa and Louis E. Goebel (argued), Goebel & Shensa, San Diego, CA, for plaintiffs-appellants. 2 Katharine C. Sheehan and Diann H. Kim (argued), Tuttle & Taylor, Los Angeles, CA, for defendants-appellees. 3 Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California. 4 Before: D.W. NELSON, and REINHARDT, Circuit Judges, and CALLISTER, District Judge. * CALLISTER, Senior District Judge: 5 Franchisees of an Atlantic Richfield Company (ARCO) gas station and convenience store sued ARCO when their franchise was not renewed. 1 The District Court granted summary judgment to ARCO, and the franchisees appealed. We affirm. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND 6 In 1986, the appellants, Wilfredo Reyes, and his wife, Bernardita, wanted to purchase a franchise for an existing ARCO…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.