United States v. John Doe

Good Law
13 F.3d 302·93 Daily Journal DAR 16592·1993 WL 532742·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 33633·93 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9675
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 28, 199392-30258California840 words

Opinion

Opinion

Hall, J.

Defendant John Doe appeals his adjudication of juvenile delinquency for knowingly engaging in sexual contact with a person younger than twelve years of age, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 5031 and 2244(a)(1). Defendant contends that the district court never acquired jurisdiction because the government failed to comply with 18 U.S.C. § 5032 , and that the court improperly relied on groundless inferences in sentencing him to a three year term of imprisonment and recommending incarceration with the California Youth Authority. We conclude that although this court has jurisdiction over the appeal, the district court lacked jurisdiction to commence juvenile delinquency proceedings against the minor. Therefore we vacate the adjudication of delinquent status, vacate the sentence imposed and remand to the district court with instructions to dismiss the information without prejudice.

I.

Section 5032 of the United States Code, Title 18, sets out two different certification requirements for juvenile delinquency proceedings in federal district courts: (1) a “need certification” provision, requiring certification by the Attorney General that there is a need for proceedings to take place in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.