Charry v. State of California
Opinion
Opinion
13 F.3d 1386 Guillermo CHARRY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA; California Youth Authority; Dan Hoy; John Sullivan; Daniel Boczek; Jacqueline Silva; Clyde McDowell; Sheriff Sherman Block; Nate Garth; Jerry Melnick; County of Los Angeles, a political subdivision of the State of California; and Does I through XX, inclusive, Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-55541. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Oct. 7, 1993. Decided Jan. 18, 1994. 1 Edward M. Fox, Klass, Helman & Ross, Los Angeles, CA, for plaintiff-appellant. 2 James J. Petzke, Deputy Atty. Gen., Los Angeles, CA, for defendants-appellees. 3 Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California, Dickran Tevrizian, District Judge, Presiding. 4 Before: REINHARDT and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges, and KAUFMAN, * District Judge. FRANK A. KAUFMAN, Senior District Judge: 5 Guillermo Charry appeals the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of defendants with respect to Charry's claim under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 that his equal protection and due process rights were violated when time spent on parole was not credited toward his sentence of confinement,…