Ernest F. Modzelewski v. Resolution Trust Corporation, as Receiver for Merabank, a Federal Savings Bank, Gene E. Rice v. Resolution Trust Corporation, as Receiver for Merabank, a Federal Savings Bank

Good Law
14 F.3d 1374·94 Daily Journal DAR 1045·17 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2298·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 874·94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 408
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 20, 199492-15670California3,612 words

Opinion

Opinion

14 F.3d 1374 62 USLW 2471 , 17 Employee Benefits Cas. 2298 Ernest F. MODZELEWSKI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. RESOLUTION TRUST CORPORATION, as Receiver for MeraBank, a Federal Savings Bank, Defendant-Appellee. Gene E. RICE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. RESOLUTION TRUST CORPORATION, as Receiver for MeraBank, a Federal Savings Bank, Defendant-Appellee. Nos. 92-15670, 92-15865. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Aug. 11, 1993. Decided Jan. 20, 1994. Raymond M. Hunter, Hunter & Lehman, Phoenix, AZ, for plaintiff-appellant Modzelewski. Peter K. Rosen and Dennis A. Winston, Rosen & Winston, Los Angeles, CA, for plaintiff-appellant Rice. Bruce C. Taylor, RTC, Washington, DC, John H. Bernstein, Diana C. Fields, Kutak Rock, Denver, CO, and E. Scott Dosek, Kutak Rock, Phoenix, AZ, for the defendant-appellee. Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona. Before: KOZINSKI, THOMPSON and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. KOZINSKI, Circuit Judge: 1 Starting in the 1970s, MeraBank Savings and Loan offered high level employees "salary continuation agreements," presumably to secure the most talented managers. Nonetheless, it went the way of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.