In Re United Insurance Management, Inc.

Good Law
14 F.3d 1380·143 A.L.R. Fed. 691·94 Daily Journal DAR 1040·30 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 792·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 875
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 20, 199492-16397California3,500 words

Opinion

Opinion

14 F.3d 1380 30 Collier Bankr.Cas.2d 792 In re UNITED INSURANCE MANAGEMENT, INC., Debtor. ERNST & YOUNG, as successor-in-interest to Arthur Young & Company; Karl A. Haushalter, Jr., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Robert K. MATSUMOTO, Trustee for Debtor United Insurance Management, Inc. and Paul I. Brown, Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-16397. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Dec. 13, 1993. Decided Jan. 20, 1994. Steven B. Jacobson, Torkildson, Katz, Jossem, Fonseca, Jaffe, Moore & Hetherington, Honolulu, HI, for plaintiffs-appellants. Patrick Jaress, Jaress & Raffetto, Honolulu, HI, for defendants-appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Hawaii. Before LAY, * HALL, and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges. CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL, Circuit Judge: 1 Ernst & Young appeals a district court order remanding the bankruptcy court's summary judgment with instructions to determine whether the doctrine of equitable tolling preserves the claims of chapter 7 debtor United Insurance Management, Inc. despite expiration of the Bankruptcy Code's statute of limitations. Because the doctrine of equitable tolling is inapplicable as a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.