United States v. Manuel Antonio Valencia, United States of America v. Maria Marleny Loaiza, United States of America v. Juana Lopez, United States of America v. Miguel Antonio Carmona-Arroyave

Good Law
15 F.3d 149·94 Daily Journal DAR 1121·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 1353·94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 631
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 28, 199493-30015California1,259 words

Opinion

Opinion

15 F.3d 149 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Manuel Antonio VALENCIA, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Maria Marleny LOAIZA, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Juana LOPEZ, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Miguel Antonio CARMONA-ARROYAVE, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 92-30458, 92-30459, 92-30490 and 93-30015. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Aug. 30, 1993. Decided Jan. 28, 1994. Robert A. Goffredi, Reese and Goffredi, Portland, OR, for defendant-appellant Manuel Antonio Valencia. John E. Storkel, Storkel & Grefenson, Salem, OR, for defendant-appellant Maria Marleny Loaiza. Mark Bennett Weintraub, Weintraub & Halley, Portland, OR, for defendant-appellant Miguel Antonio Carmona-Arroyave. Ellen C. Pitcher, Asst. Federal Public Defender, Portland, OR, for defendant-appellant Juana Lopez. Leslie K. Baker, Asst. U.S. Atty., Portland, OR, for plaintiff-appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon. Before: BROWNING, SCHROEDER, and HALL, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: I. 1 Miguel Antonio…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.