Jonathan Acosta Edward C. Acosta v. Chino Unified School District, a Municipal Entity Larry Gillespie, in His Capacity as a School Administrator and Teacher, Respectively of the School District Craig Miller, in His "Official" Capacity as School Administrator and Teacher, and an Individual, Respectively, of Course, of the School District, Jonathan Acosta Edward C. Acosta v. Chino Unified School District, a Municipal Entity Larry Gillespie, an Individual in His Capacity as a School Administrator and Teacher, Respectively of the School District

Good Law
15 F.3d 1082·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 6237
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 8, 199492-55803California2,074 words

Opinion

Opinion

15 F.3d 1082 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Jonathan ACOSTA; Edward C. Acosta, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CHINO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, a municipal entity; Larry Gillespie, in his capacity as a school administrator and teacher, respectively of the School District; Craig Miller, in his "Official" capacity as school administrator and teacher, and an individual, respectively, of course, of the School District, Defendants-Appellees. Jonathan ACOSTA; Edward C. Acosta, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. CHINO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, a municipal entity; Larry Gillespie, an individual in his capacity as a school administrator and teacher, respectively of the School District, Defendants-Appellants. Nos. 92-55803, 92-56463. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Feb. 3, 1994. Decided Feb. 8, 1994. Before: TANG, PREGERSON, and NOONAN, Circuit Judges. 1 Memorandum * 2 Jonathan Acosta, a minor, and his father Edward C. Acosta appeal the district…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.