Ussec

Ussec v. John Thomas

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 27, 202221-15146California373 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 27 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

U.S. SECURITIES & EXCHANGE No. 21-15146

COMMISSION,

D.C. No. 2:19-cv-01515-APG-VCF Plaintiff-Appellee,

v. MEMORANDUM*

JOHN F. THOMAS, AKA John Frank, AKA John Marshall, AKA John Rodgers, AKA Jonathan West; THOMAS BECKER,

Defendants-Appellants,

and

DOUGLAS MARTIN; et al.,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Andrew P. Gordon, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted June 15, 2022**

Before: SILVERMAN, WATFORD, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). John F. Thomas and Thomas Becker appeal pro se from the district court’s

default judgments entered against them in a civil enforcement action brought by

the Securities and Exchange Commission…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.