United States v. Alejandro Incera

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 27, 202221-10335California286 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 27 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 21-10335

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 2:18-cr-00169-JCM-NJK-2 v.

ALEJANDRO ALEX INCERA, AKA MEMORANDUM*

Alexander Jiminez-Incera,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada James C. Mahan, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted June 15, 2022**

Before: SILVERMAN, WATFORD, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.

Alejandro Alex Incera appeals from the district court’s order denying his

motion for compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i). We have

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Incera contends that the district court should have granted his motion

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). because his history of Guillain-Barre…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.