John Miken v. Ictsi Oregon, Inc.

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 27, 202220-71272California1,196 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 27 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOHN P. MIKEN, No. 20-71272

Petitioner, BRB No. 19-0119

v.

MEMORANDUM*

ICTSI OREGON, INC.; et al.,

Respondents.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board

Argued and Submitted January 13, 2022 Pasadena, California

Before: WALLACE and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges, and LASNIK, ** District Judge.

John Miken petitions for review of a decision of the Benefits Review Board

(BRB) affirming with modification for scrivener’s error a decision of an

administrative law judge (ALJ) concerning Miken’s disability benefits under the

Longshore and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act, 33 U.S.C. § 901 et seq. (the

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The Honorable Robert S. Lasnik, United States District Judge for the Western District of Washington, sitting by designation. Longshore Act). Miken’s claim stemmed from a work-related knee…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.