David Burns v. Tasheena Sandoval

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 27, 202221-15409California312 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 27 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DAVID BURNS, No. 21-15409

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:18-cv-00086-MMD-

CLB

v.

TASHEENA SANDOVAL; CLARK; MEMORANDUM*

WALTER ROMERO; HAL

HOLLINGSWORTH; HAROLD BYRNE;

WILLIAM GITTERE; HEALER; TRAVIS,

C/O; HAMMEL; UNDERWOOD,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Miranda M. Du, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted June 15, 2022**

Before: SILVERMAN, WATFORD, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.

Nevada state prisoner David Burns appeals pro se from the district court’s

summary judgment for failure to exhaust administrative remedies in his 42 U.S.C.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). § 1983 action alleging deliberate indifference to safety and retaliation. We…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.