David Burns v. Tasheena Sandoval
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 27, 202221-15409California312 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 27 2022
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
DAVID BURNS, No. 21-15409
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:18-cv-00086-MMD-
CLB
v.
TASHEENA SANDOVAL; CLARK; MEMORANDUM*
WALTER ROMERO; HAL
HOLLINGSWORTH; HAROLD BYRNE;
WILLIAM GITTERE; HEALER; TRAVIS,
C/O; HAMMEL; UNDERWOOD,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Miranda M. Du, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted June 15, 2022**
Before: SILVERMAN, WATFORD, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.
Nevada state prisoner David Burns appeals pro se from the district court’s
summary judgment for failure to exhaust administrative remedies in his 42 U.S.C.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). § 1983 action alleging deliberate indifference to safety and retaliation. We…