Arcume v. Aloha Motorcycle U-Drive, Inc.
Opinion
Opinion
15 F.3d 1082 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Kevin R.B. ARCUME, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ALOHA MOTORCYCLE U-DRIVE, INC., a Hawaii corporation, dba Aloha Funway Rentals; Bradley Skinner, also known as Brad Skinner; Christina Humen, an individual, Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-16685. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Jan. 18, 1994. * Decided Feb. 7, 1994. Before: HUG, WIGGINS, and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Kevin R.B. Arcume appeals pro se the district court's award of Rule 11 sanctions in the amount of $11,197.64 to defendants. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . 1 3 We review the district court's rulings on Rule 11 sanctions for an abuse of discretion. Townsend v. Holman Consulting Corp., 929 F.2d 1358, 1365-66 (9th Cir.1990) (en banc). In imposing sanctions, the district court abuses its discretion if it relies on an erroneous assessment of the evidence or an erroneous view of the law. Cooter & Gell v.…