Charles Banks and Joseph Dyrcz v. Prudential California Realty Rodeo Realty Jon Douglas Co. Patricia Temkin, Nicky Borghei Sandra Deering Jan Cohen Anita Finklestin Gary Lee Evans, Charles Banks and Joseph Dyrcz v. Prudential California Realty Patricia Temkin Nicky Borghei Sandra Deering Gary Lee Evans

Good Law
15 F.3d 1082·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 6230
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 10, 199492-55750California3,563 words

Opinion

Opinion

15 F.3d 1082 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Charles BANKS and Joseph Dyrcz, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. PRUDENTIAL CALIFORNIA REALTY; Rodeo Realty; Jon Douglas Co.; Patricia Temkin,; Nicky Borghei; Sandra Deering; Jan Cohen; Anita Finklestin; Gary Lee Evans, Defendants-Appellees, Charles BANKS and Joseph Dyrcz, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. PRUDENTIAL CALIFORNIA REALTY; Patricia Temkin; Nicky Borghei; Sandra Deering; Gary Lee Evans, Defendants-Appellees. Nos. 92-55750, 92-56037. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Dec. 7, 1993. Decided Jan. 10, 1994. Before: FLETCHER, PREGERSON, and HALL, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Charles Banks and Joseph Dyrcz, an interracial, homosexual couple, appeal a jury verdict for the Prudential California Realty and individual Prudential agents [hereinafter "Prudential"]. Banks and Dyrcz alleged that Prudential violated Title VIII of the Civil Rights Act ( 42 U.S.C. Secs. 3601 et seq.), 42 U.S.C.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.