In Re Viquar Ahmed, Debtor, Viquar Ahmed v. Lorraine Rodriguez

15 F.3d 1082 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. In re Viquar AHMED, Debtor, Viquar AHMED, Appellant, v. Lorraine RODRIGUEZ, Appellee. No. 92-55757. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 20, 1993. * Decided Jan. 6, 1994. Before: SNEED, NOONAN, and TROTT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Viquar Ahmed appeals pro se the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel's ("BAP") judgment (1) affirming the bankruptcy court's dismissal of Ahmed's Chapter 13 bankruptcy petition, (2) declaring Ahmed a vexatious litigant, and (3) imposing sanctions against him. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 158 (d), and we dismiss in part and affirm in part. 3 We review decisions of the BAP de novo. California Dep't of Health Serv. v. Jensen (In re Jensen), 995 F.2d 925, 927 (9th Cir.1993). We review the bankruptcy court's conclusions of law de novo, and its findings of fact for clear error. Id. 4 * Dismissal of the Bankruptcy Petition 5 Ahmed appealed to the BAP the…