American Association of Naturopathic Physicians v. American Association of Naturopathic Physicians

15 F.3d 1082 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF NATUROPATHIC PHYSICIANS, a non-profit Oregon corporation, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF NATUROPATHIC PHYSICIANS, a non-profit Nevada corporation, Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-35038. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Jan. 31, 1994. * Decided Feb. 2, 1994. Before: WRIGHT, REAVLEY ** and LEAVY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM *** 2 Plaintiff sued defendant for trade name and service mark infringement, unfair competition, and violation of the Washington Consumer Protection Act. Defendant had adopted plaintiff's name, National Association of Naturopathic Physicians. The district court denied defendant's motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction, ordered defendant to obtain an attorney, sanctioned defendant's attorney, and granted summary judgment in favor of plaintiff on all claims, including its request for attorneys' fees. We affirm. 3 1. Personal…