Ramirez
Ramirez v. Pacific Bay Masonry CA1/2
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 27, 2022A163316California4,940 words
Opinion
Opinion
BACKGROUND
Ramirez worked as a mason for Pacific Bay from 2017 to 2019. Naranjo also worked for Pacific Bay during the same time period as a hod carrier. A. Arbitration Agreement At the start of their employment, Ramirez and Naranjo each signed an “Employment, Confidential Information, and Arbitration Agreement” (Agreement). Section 9 of the Agreement is entitled “Arbitration and Equitable Relief” and provides, in relevant part: “COMPANY AND I
BOTH AGREE THAT ANY AND ALL DISPUTES, CLAIMS, OR CAUSES
OF ACTION, IN LAW OR EQUITY, ARISING FROM OR RELATING TO
THE ENFORCEMENT, BREACH, PERFORMANCE . . . OF THIS
AGREEMENT, OUR EMPLOYMENT RELATIONSHIP, OR THE
TERMINATION OF OUR EMPLOYMENT RELATIONSHIP SHALL BE
RESOLVED, TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW, BY
FINAL, BINDING AND CONFIDENTIAL ARBITRATION IN SANTA
CLARA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA CONDUCTED BEFORE A SINGLE
ARBITRATOR BY JAMS, INC. (‘JAMS’) OR ITS SUCCESSOR, UNDER THE
2 THEN APPLICABLE JAMS RULES.” It continues: “BY AGREEING TO