Allen v. Josephine County

15 F.3d 1082 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Edward E. ALLEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. JOSEPHINE COUNTY; William Arnado, Sheriff; Daniel B. Calvert; Mark Dickson; Tele-Matic of Oregon, Inc.; Robert J. Mohrbacher; U.S. West Communications; ACI Long Distance; Scott Mohrbacher; Rebecca Brown, Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-35163. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Jan. 4, 1994. * Decided Jan. 12, 1994. Before: REINHARDT, O'SCANNLAIN, and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Edward E. Allen appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action against Josephine County, Oregon and county employees (collectively "the County defendants"); Tele-Matic of Oregon, Inc.; U.S. West Communications; and others. Allen claims that as a pro se prisoner incarcerated in the Josephine County Jail from May to October 1991, he was denied the right to self-representation on pending criminal charges because the…