Arriola v. Safeco

15 F.3d 1082 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. James ARRIOLA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SAFECO, a foreign corporation; Safeco Insurance Company of America, a Washington corporation, dba Safeco; Safeco Credit; John and/or Jane Does I through V whose true identities are unknown, Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-35321. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Nov. 2, 1993. Decided Dec. 21, 1993. Before: TANG, FARRIS, and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Arriola argues the district court erred in granting Safeco Insurance and Safeco Credit's motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law because a reasonable jury could have concluded the defendants willfully failed to comply with section 1681q of the Fair Credit Reporting Act. Arriola also argues there was evidence that he suffered actual damages (mental anguish) as a result of both defendants' allegedly negligent violations of section 1681q. 3 We have jurisdiction of the timely appeal…