Alex Bonilla v. Eddie Ylst

Good Law
15 F.3d 1083·1994 WL 32615·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 6257
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 3, 199492-55501California2,941 words

Opinion

Opinion

15 F.3d 1083 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Alex BONILLA, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Eddie YLST, et. al., Respondent-Appellee. No. 92-55501. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Nov. 3, 1993. Decided Feb. 3, 1994. Before: Fletcher, Pregerson, and Norris, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 California state prisoner Alex Bonilla appeals the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 habeas corpus petition, which challenges his conviction for rape, attempted rape, and forcible oral copulation. We have jurisdiction over the appeal under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2253 . We affirm. BACKGROUND 3 Appellant Alex Bonilla is currently serving a 21-year sentence after he was convicted in state court of one count of rape, two counts of attempted rape, and five counts of forcible oral copulation in concert. 4 Before Bonilla's trial, approximately five weeks after the rape, the victim Dawn Weeks ("Weeks") was shown a photospread. The detective…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.