Henry A. Cobos v. Ray-Go Wagner, Inc., Mi-Jack Products, Inc., Henry A. Cobos, Ray-Go Wagner, Inc., Mi-Jack Products, Inc., Defendant-Intervenors-Appellees v. Eagle Pacific Insurance Company, Plaintiff-Intervenor-Appellant

15 F.3d 1083 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Henry A. COBOS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. RAY-GO WAGNER, INC., Mi-Jack Products, Inc., et al., Defendants-Appellees. Henry A. COBOS, Ray-Go Wagner, Inc., Mi-Jack Products, Inc., et al., Defendant-Intervenors-Appellees, v. EAGLE PACIFIC INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff-Intervenor-Appellant. Nos. 91-56196, 91-56231. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Aug. 3, 1993. Decided Jan. 11, 1994. Before: NOONAN, FERNANDEZ and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 We must reverse because of error in failing to instruct on the consumer expectations branch of strict liability for design defect. 3 We reject Ray-Go's argument that Eagle Pacific's appeal was untimely. Eagle Pacific filed its notice of appeal within fourteen days of the filing of Cobos' notice of appeal. It was therefore timely under Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(a)(3). 4 We need not reach Cobos's argument that the district…