Serdy

Serdy v. Alnasser CA2/6

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 28, 2022B314924California2,228 words

Opinion

Opinion

Yegan, J.

Filed 6/28/22 Serdy v. Alnasser CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SIX

SHAY SERDY, 2d Civil No. B314924 (Super. Ct. No. 56-2020- Plaintiff and Respondent, 00545893-CU-PO-VTA) (Ventura County) v.

SUMAYYAH IBRAHIM

ALNASSER et al.,

Defendants and Appellants.

Sumayyah Ibrahim Alnasser and Sumaya369, LLC (collectively, Appellants), appeal from the trial court’s order denying their motion to strike Shay Serdy’s complaint as a strategic lawsuit against public participation (SLAPP). (Code Civ. Proc.,1 § 425.16.) Appellants contend Serdy failed to show a reasonable probability of prevailing on the merits of the malicious prosecution claim in her complaint. Alternatively, they contend that even if Serdy made…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.