Bhushan v. City of Berkeley

15 F.3d 1083 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Monika BHUSHAN; Jennifer Contreras-Danner; Craig Croteau; Laura Nicodemus Eugene Perez; Christobal Silva; Althea Yronwode, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CITY OF BERKELEY; City of Berkeley Police Department; University Students Co-Operative Association; George Proper; Phoenix Operations, Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-16898. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Jan. 4, 1994. * Decided Jan. 11, 1994. Before: REINHARDT, O'SCANNLAIN, and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Monika Bhushan and various individuals (collectively "Bushan") appeal the district court's summary judgment in favor of the City of Berkeley (City) in Bushan's 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action alleging violations of their civil rights. The City contends that we lack jurisdiction because Bhushan's notice of appeal is untimely. We agree and dismiss the appeal. 3 A timely notice of appeal is mandatory and jurisdictional. Munden v.…