Antonio Camacho v. U.S. Immigration and Naturalization Service

15 F.3d 1083 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Antonio CAMACHO, Petitioner, v. U.S. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 92-70566. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Jan. 12, 1994. Decided Feb. 2, 1994. Before: ALDISERT, * WIGGINS and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Petitioner Antonio Camacho appeals the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals dismissing his appeal and affirming the decision of the immigration judge finding him deportable based on his conviction of a controlled substance offense and denying his application for a discretionary waiver of deportability. Camacho also appeals the Board's denial of his motion to reopen his case on the ground that he had become eligible for such relief only by filing a meritless appeal. I. 3 Camacho, a native of the Philippines who entered this country as an exchange visitor on July 7, 1970, obtained the status of an alien lawfully admitted to the…