Clooney v. Edwards

15 F.3d 1083 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Robert Vincent CLOONEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Gary P. EDWARDS, Thurston County Sheriff's Office; Allen Plue, Chief Deputy, Thurston County Correction Faculty; Lt. Tarver, Sheriff, Thurston County Correction Faculty, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-35434. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 17, 1993. * Decided Jan. 20, 1994. Before: BROWNING, NORRIS, and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Clooney sued prison officials under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 for opening his legal mail outside of his presence. The district court granted summary judgment for the prison officials, denied Clooney's request for an extension of time for more discovery, and struck his amended complaint. 3 * Clooney has failed to present any evidence raising a genuine issue of material fact concerning any of the elements of his section 1983 claim. First, he has not advanced any evidence that Edwards, Plue, or…