Ruben B. Botello v. The County of Humboldt

15 F.3d 1083 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Ruben B. BOTELLO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The COUNTY OF HUMBOLDT, Defendant-Appellee. No. 93-15594. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 20, 1993. * Decided Jan. 6, 1994. Before: SNEED, NOONAN, and TROTT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Ruben Botello appeals pro se the district court's dismissal with prejudice of his complaint against the County of Humboldt alleging violations of 42 U.S.C. Secs. 1981 , 1983, 1985, 1986, and 2000d, arising from a child custody dispute. Botello also appeals pro se the district court's 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1915 (d) dismissal with prejudice of Botello's amended complaint. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We affirm. 3 Botello filed a complaint against the County of Humboldt alleging the County of Humboldt conspired with unnamed defendants to violate his civil rights. The allegations arose from an underlying state court child custody action. The…