Michael George Brown v. William D. Ratterman Jo Ann Inks

15 F.3d 1083 73 A.F.T.R.2d 94 -826 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Michael George BROWN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. William D. RATTERMAN; Jo Ann Inks, Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-15789. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 20, 1993. * Filed Jan. 6, 1994. Refiled Jan. 24, 1994. Before: SNEED, NOONAN, and TROTT, Circuit Judges. ORDER 1 The memorandum disposition filed January 6, 1994 is withdrawn. The clerk is directed to file the attached memorandum disposition. 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 Michael George Brown appeals pro se the district court's dismissal for lack of jurisdiction of his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action alleging that his constitutional rights were violated in connection with a local property tax assessment and seizure for public sale of Brown's property by defendants William Ratterman and Jo Ann Inks. Brown sought an injunction to stop the sale of his property and a declaration that property taxes could not be assessed against the…