Burlesque Enterprise v. City of Los Angeles CA2/1

Filed 6/28/22 Burlesque Enterprise v. City of Los Angeles CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

BURLESQUE ENTERPRISE, INC., B313486

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. 20STCP01311) v.

CITY OF LOS ANGELES et al.,

Defendants and Respondents.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Mitchell L. Beckloff, Judge. Affirmed. Law Offices of Joshua Kaplan and Joshua Kaplan for Plaintiff and Appellant. Michael N. Feuer, City Attorney, Scott Marcus, Chief Assistant City Attorney, Blithe S. Bock, Managing Assistant City Attorney, and Michael M. Walsh, Deputy City Attorney, for Defendants and Respondents. ______________________ Burlesque Enterprise, Inc. (Burlesque)…